The Internet and the Digital Economy
With forward-looking industry insights, Tongfang Law Firm was among the first to establish a foothold in the legal services sector for the digital economy. By integrating theoretical research with practical resources and pooling the expertise of its top-tier lawyers, the firm has set up the Tongfang Digital Economy Legal Services Center and has gradually developed a digital economy legal service system that reflects Tongfang’s unique characteristics. Our goal is to provide clients with cutting-edge, professional, and comprehensive legal services and solutions.
Business Type/Service Content/Scope
Data and Cybersecurity
Data Compliance Due Diligence
Privacy and Personal Information Protection
Competition Compliance in the Internet and Digital Economy
Resolution of Civil and Commercial Disputes Involving Data Rights
Administrative Regulation and Criminal Risk Prevention
Representative performance
Data Compliance Services—A Project for a Large Medical Institution in Liaoning Province: Conducting Data Compliance Due Diligence and Building a Compliance Management System Based on Application Scenarios Based on the application scenarios of medical data, Tongfang Lawyers conducted a comprehensive compliance due diligence covering the entire lifecycle of data processing—including personal information—and effectively developed tailored compliance implementation plans. This helped the client not only reduce data compliance risks and fulfill compliance obligations efficiently but also continue to provide medical diagnosis and treatment services as well as conduct scientific research activities.
Dispute Resolution Regarding Internet and Data Rights—A Civil Litigation Case Involving a Major Video Website’s Claim Against an Internet E-commerce Platform for Unfair Competition The Tongfang lawyers, acting as agents for the defendant company, actively responded to the lawsuit. Through a thorough analysis and argumentation of the legitimacy of the alleged conduct, they submitted that the products or services sold by the defendant company did not constitute a substantial substitute for those offered by the plaintiff, did not harm the plaintiff’s competitive interests, and did not impede or disrupt the plaintiff’s normal business operations. Consequently, their defense—that the defendant’s actions did not amount to unfair competition infringement—was accepted by the court, leading to the case being concluded with the plaintiff withdrawing its claim.
Typical Criminal Defense Cases Involving the Digital Economy—Liu’s Crime of Sabotaging Computer Information Systems; Li’s Crime of Illegally Using Information Networks.
Copyright © 2025 Liaoning Tongfang Law Firm