Provided legal advisory services to multiple institutions, including the First Affiliated Hospital of a certain medical university, the Second Affiliated Hospital of the same medical university, a certain orthopedic hospital in Huludao, and a hospital in Suizhong County, offering them comprehensive legal support to ensure compliant operations and stable development of medical institutions through professional services.

Responsible for compliance work related to clinical trials at a large Grade-III hospital and several other medical institutions, providing comprehensive legal support throughout the conduct of clinical trials, safeguarding the rights and interests of research institutions and investigators, and protecting the rights and interests of trial participants.

Provided specialized legal services for the construction of a trade secret protection system for a pharmaceutical company, including identifying the scope of confidential information such as core technologies and formulations, revising confidentiality agreements for R&D personnel, designing an intellectual property tracking mechanism for departing employees, establishing a comprehensive, end-to-end confidentiality management system, and ensuring the effective implementation of the system.

Provided legal services for a medical device company and an investment firm regarding the transfer of patent rights and technological achievements, conducted technical due diligence, assessed asset value in combination with market prospects and technological innovation, developed customized transfer plans, drafted and reviewed specialized contracts governing ownership of rights and risk allocation, and assisted both parties in completing the asset transfer.

In the case of “Zhao Mouling v. Huludao Hui’er Orthopedic Hospital—Dispute over Liability for Medical Damage,” the hospital’s representative requested that the expert witness appear in court. Following a successful cross-examination, the court did not adopt the expert opinion unfavorable to me, and the case was ultimately resolved smoothly through mediation.

In the case of “Chen Mouying v. Suizhong Hui’er Orthopedic Hospital—Dispute over Liability for Medical Injury,” representing the hospital, we successfully applied to the procuratorial authorities for a protest and received their support, ultimately prompting a retrial and securing a revised judgment.

In the case of “Dispute over Medical Liability between Mr. Nan and a Certain University Hospital in China,” despite the patient’s failure to undergo an autopsy and the objective difficulties in presenting evidence, the attorney representing the patient, through professional argumentation, successfully persuaded the forensic appraisal authority to determine that the medical institution bore equal responsibility, thereby laying a favorable foundation for the first-instance trial and ensuring the conclusion of the first-instance proceedings.

In the case of “Duan v. the Affiliated Hospital of a Certain University in Dalian regarding medical malpractice liability,” the attorney representing the patient successfully identified the hospital’s primary liability through forensic medical appraisal, securing a decisive victory at the first-instance trial. Moreover, the hospital’s representative was prompted to offer an apology in court, thereby restoring the client’s dignity and obtaining compensation.

In the case of “Liu v. Qi, Weihai Central Hospital, and Others—Dispute over Medical Damage Liability,” this case involves the intersection of criminal and civil law, as well as concurrent liability for personal injury and medical damage, making the legal relationship highly complex. Representing the patient side, we secured a substantial compensation award for our client in the first instance through precise legal arguments. Subsequently, both the second-instance and retrial proceedings successfully upheld our client’s favorable verdict.

In the case of “Liu v. a Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Linzhou—Dispute over Medical Damage Liability,” the attorney representing the patient successfully obtained crucial, core evidence through meticulous investigation and evidence collection, thereby establishing a powerful deterrent that compelled the hospital to proactively request mediation. Ultimately, this led to an exceptionally favorable compensation settlement for the client.

In the case of “Yu v. the General Hospital of a Certain Military Region—Dispute over Medical Malpractice Liability,” I acted as counsel for the patient’s side. In this case, the patient died without an autopsy being performed, making it extremely difficult to determine liability. Through professional and strategic representation, the final expert opinion concluded that the medical institution bore “equal to primary responsibility,” and the compensation awarded far exceeded the client’s initial expectations.

In the case of “Li v. a certain hospital affiliated with Medical University—Dispute over Medical Malpractice Liability,” I acted as counsel for the patient. The patient’s medical condition was highly complex (with more than 20 diagnoses), and no autopsy was performed. As a result, the expert appraisal process nearly reached an impasse. Despite these significant challenges, I ultimately succeeded in overcoming numerous obstacles to complete the appraisal. During the first-instance trial, I meticulously cross-examined the expert witness, effectively exposing the hospital’s shortcomings and strengthening the judge’s conviction regarding the hospital’s negligence. Ultimately, the court ruled that the hospital was liable, and this decision was upheld on appeal.

In the case of “Li v. a certain hospital affiliated with Southern Medical University regarding a dispute over medical malpractice liability,” the attorney representing the patient cross-examined the expert witness in court regarding the expert opinion. Thanks to meticulous preparation before the trial and skillful questioning techniques during the hearing, the attorney successfully persuaded the judge to increase the compensation amount by an additional 15% on top of the originally determined equal share of responsibility, thereby securing an extra several hundred thousand yuan in compensation for the client.